英文摘要 |
This article studies Chunqiu Houzhuan (Later Commentary on Spring and Autumn Annals) written by Chen Fuliang (1137-1203) in the Southern Song Dynasty. It investigates the way of interpreting the Classics in this book under the contexts of the history of the Classics and academic history. Chen Fuliang followed the research mode that Lu Zuqian (1137-1181) had used to interpret Zuo Zhuan (Commentary of Zuo), and further developed the research guidelines ''Penetration of Worldly Changes” from Yongjia School so as to make historical narration and interpretation of the historical events in the Spring and Autumn Period. He regarded the guidelines as criteria to clarify Chunqiu’s textual differences and sought the true meanings in its praise and criticism. This not only extended the tradition of interpreting the Classics in the Gongyang Zhuan (Commentary of Gongyang) learning in the Han Dynasty, but also embodied the academic characteristics of Yongjia School both in studying the Classics and history. Comparing with such scholars as Su Che (1039-1112), Zhu Xi (1130-1200), Lu Dagui (1227-1275), and Huang Zhen (1213-1281), Chen had better methodology in integrating the studies of Classics into historical research. Such integration was motivated by his dissatisfaction with the post-Cheng Neo-Confucianism scholars who attached the metaphysical idea of “heavenly principles vs. human desires” to Chunqiu. He therefore decided to take the physical idea of “changes in the world” in understanding Chunqiu. As such, his ideas became the academic mainstream and thus raised his reputation in academia in terms of adjusting Cheng Sect’s absurd and nihilistic learning climate to concrete historical descriptions and happenings. |