月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
鵝湖學誌:中國哲學及西方思想研究 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
論牟宗三先生對老子形上思想之定位
並列篇名
Mr. Mou Tsung-san's Onientation to Laotze's Metaphysical Thoughts
作者 高柏園
中文摘要
老子思想是道家思想的主要根據,也是決定道家思想性格的重要依據。我們可以說,掌握了老子思想,也就掌握了道家思想,進而也就能準確地區分儒道思想之異同。在當代學者對老子思想之研究中,牟宗三先生的立場最為特殊,也最值得討論。牟先生曾先通過周文疲弊,指出中國哲學仍是以實踐為優先的事實,而後,再以實踐所呈現之境界,說明中國哲學之精神。以此為線索,牟先生乃判定儒道思想皆為一實踐之智慧,亦是一境界型態的形上學。此中,儒道之區分,可就以下數義加以說明:1. 儒學以道德為優先,而道家則以自由在為訴求。2. 儒學通過道德要求而有積極性之創造,而道家則以遮撥之方式,消極地去執而成就一種實現道理。3. 儒學之實有型態乃是就道德創造上說,也因而形成「綜貫綜講」的型態,有別於道家「縱貫橫講」之型態。除了以上數義之說明外,本文也討論了袁保新教授對牟先生老學詮釋之反省,並分別就主觀主義、主觀心境與道、道的規範義、境界型態與實有型態之關係等,加以說明袁教授之立場及其可能之發展。簡言之,牟先生其實已經自覺主觀主義之危險而加以避免,由於此時之聖人境界雖由主體成就,但不表示此主體所成就之境界就必然是主觀,而缺乏客觀、普遍之意義。因此,主觀心境誠然是道顯現之「場所」。然而也應同時是道之具體表現,道不必抽象為遠離生活世界之道自身。同時,由於聖人之修養以成境界,此中之價值義十分明確,因此,道也因價值義而具規範義。
英文摘要
Laotze's thoughts is the main basis as well as the formation of Taoism. We may say that seize Laotze, seize Taoism. Furthermore, we can differentiate Confucianism and Taoism correctly. Mr. Mou Tsung-san has the most special position and whose thoughts are worth discussing in contemporary Laotze Studies. Mr. Mou points out that Chinese philosophy gives priority to practice and after that, he describes its spirits by the state. By this clue, Mr. Mou ascertains that both Confucianism and Taoism are practical wisdom as well as state mode metaphysics we can differentiate between Confucianism and Taoism as follows: Firstly, Confucianism gives priority to morality; Taoism exists in pursuit of freedom. Secondly, Confucianism create itself positively through morality; Taoism achieves itself passively by the way of conceal. Thirdly, Confucianism forms a mode of “verticality, vertical discussion”; Taoism forms a mode of “verticality, transverse discussion”. In addition, I'll discuss Professor Yuan, Pao-hsin's opinions about Mr. Mou's interpretation of Laotze. Briefly speaking, actually, Mr. Mou has already aware of the danger of subjectivism and try to avoid. Certainly, moral character in the “space” to appear, however, it should be the concrete expression of The Fundamental Truth. At the mean time, The Fundamental Truth has meaning of model by meaning of value.
起訖頁 1-26
關鍵詞 周文疲弊境界型態實有型態實踐哲學無為the cultural bankruptcy of the Chou Dynastystate modebeing modepractical philosophyNon-ExistenceinactionThe Fundamental Truth
刊名 鵝湖學誌:中國哲學及西方思想研究  
期數 200212 (29期)
出版單位 鵝湖月刊社
該期刊-下一篇 僧肇哲學論述中「狂言」之研究兼論其思想史上的意義
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄