月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
休閒與社會研究 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
城鄉地區高齡者參與休閒活動階段之休閒效益體驗差異研究
並列篇名
A study of the discrepancies between rural and urban elders’ leisure benefits experience on recreation activities
作者 李晶羅雅馨 (Ya-xing Lo)姚大偉
中文摘要
本研究目的:(一)瞭解城鄉地區高齡者之休閒效益;(二)比較不同階段之高齡者參與活動的休閒效益;(三)分析高齡者參與不同活動之休閒效益;(四)探討城鄉地區高齡者之不同時期與不同活動的休閒效益。方法:採小樣本多次訪問法對新北市板橋區及臺南市西港區65歲以上之高齡者進行比較。結果:(一)板橋之休閒效益顯著高於西港;(二)休閒效益之修正期顯著高於認知期與自動期;(三)高齡者的休閒效益在不同活動中無顯著差異;(四)西港與板橋的休閒效益因不同時期呈現不同結果;(五)西港之園藝活動的生理效益顯著較高;(六)高齡者之休閒效益在不同活動與不同階段間無顯著差異;(七)在板橋,修正期在手工藝活動的社交效益顯著較高;在西港,修正期在園藝活動的社交效益顯著較高。結論:(一)因資源、交通與選擇的不同,故在板橋的休閒效益較西港高;(二)介入活動與日常生活層級之關聯性會影響休閒效益;(三)不同類型的活動在不同階段中無太大差異;(四)在休閒活動參與當下之休閒效益較高。建議:(一)活動需有立即性的回饋,以滿足高齡者需求;(二)休閒活動能貼近個人生活及外顯性的活動,使高齡者能有持續性的體驗。 Purposes: (1) to understand the difference of leisure benefits experience between rural and urban elders; (2) to compare leisure benefits experience among the different stages of elderly participate in activities; (3) to analyze the different activities at difference stages for elderly; (4) to explore the elderly leisure benefits experience among rural-urban areas and the different periods. Method: to take a panel study who are above 65 years old, and to compare the Banqiao District of New Taipei City with Sigang District of Tainan City. Results: (1) the participates in Banqiao District was significant higher than in Sigang District for leisure benefits experience; (2) The participant’s leisure benefits in fixation was significant higher than Automatic Phase; (3) There was no significant difference between activities for elderly leisure benefits; (4) The leisure benefits of Banqiao District and Sigang District showed different results in each periods; (5) The physiological benefit of horticulture activities is significantly higher than other action in Sigang District; (6) The interaction between the types and participation periods was not significant differences on the leisure benefits experience; (7) the participate in the rural and urban areas show significant difference on leisure benefits experience. Conclusions: (1) the leisure benefits in Banqiao District were higher than Sigang District due to the difference resources and transportation; (2) if the activities was a part of their life, the participation shows significant high score on leisure benefits; (3) it was no significant differences between activities and periods; (4) the leisure benefits when participating activities were higher than other periods.
英文摘要
Purposes: (1) to understand the difference of leisure benefits experience between rural and urban elders; (2) to compare leisure benefits experience among the different stages of elderly participate in activities; (3) to analyze the different activities at difference stages for elderly; (4) to explore the elderly leisure benefits experience among rural-urban areas and the different periods. Method: to take a panel study who are above 65 years old, and to compare the Banqiao District of New Taipei City with Sigang District of Tainan City. Results: (1) the participates in Banqiao District was significant higher than in Sigang District for leisure benefits experience; (2) The participant’s leisure benefits in fixation was significant higher than Automatic Phase; (3) There was no significant difference between activities for elderly leisure benefits; (4) The leisure benefits of Banqiao District and Sigang District showed different results in each periods; (5) The physiological benefit of horticulture activities is significantly higher than other action in Sigang District; (6) The interaction between the types and participation periods was not significant differences on the leisure benefits experience; (7) the participate in the rural and urban areas show significant difference on leisure benefits experience. Conclusions: (1) the leisure benefits in Banqiao District were higher than Sigang District due to the difference resources and transportation; (2) if the activities was a part of their life, the participation shows significant high score on leisure benefits; (3) it was no significant differences between activities and periods; (4) the leisure benefits when participating activities were higher than other periods.
起訖頁 1-16
關鍵詞 城鄉差異高齡者休閒效益rural-urban differencesthe elderlythe elderlyleisure benefit
刊名 休閒與社會研究  
期數 201106 (3期)
出版單位 一森國際有限公司
該期刊-下一篇 運動賽事整合行銷傳播績效之焦點團體研究--以2004年~2008年ING臺北馬拉松為例
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄