《漢書．藝文志》敘墨家探析

Analysis of ＂Hanshu Yiwenzhi＂ narrative Mohist

戰國時期是諸子百家之學蠭起的階段，《漢書．藝文志》以「諸子之學出於王官」解釋諸子學說的淵源，並且有「九流十家」之劃分。本文根據《漢志》之行文，說明其推尊、返本王官古學的基本立場，揭示其先六藝而後諸子的學術史觀；針對「墨家者流，蓋出於清廟之守」蠡測《漢志》所以如此推源墨學淵源的理由；論述墨子固然長於《詩》《書》《春秋》之學，然而其人「於禮則法夏絀周，樂則又非之」，則墨子之學所以仍被《漢志》視為「《六經》之支與流裔」，乃因孔、墨對於禮、樂均不以縟節虛文之外在形式為然，二子非存有冰炭不同爐的歧異處。墨子對於禮、樂之革新實乃針對未契孔禮真實義之儒與小人儒的再次哲學突破。

Warring States period, the rise of the philosophers learn stage,＂Hanshu Yiwenzhi＂to＂the philosophers of school for Wangguan ＂to explain the rise of the doctrine of the philosophers.Firstly, according to ＂Hanshu Yiwenzhi＂, to reveal its first six arts and then the concept of academic philosophers, to its respected the basic position of the King in the official ancient science; further for Mohist school lid for the gatekeeper of Qingmiao ＂and speculated that＂Hanshu Yiwenzhi＂pushsource the Mohist Origins reason. Second exposition Mozi good ＂poetry＂ book ＂,＂ Spring ＂,＂ at the ceremony then the law summer Deficit weeks music nor the ink learn why being detained ＂Hanshu Yiwenzhi＂ as the ＂Six Classics＂ support and flow-American. ＂ This is because Confucius、Mozi regarding the ritual, they are not so by the external form, two sub-completely is not by no means same.Mozi regarding the ritual, the happy innovation is actually aims at has not conformed to Confucian of and the villain Confucian the Confucius ritual study real significance again the philosophy breakthrough.