英文摘要 |
Norman’s reconstructions, obtained through the comparative method, are accurate and have led to several articles devoted to the study of the pronunciation and reconstruction of the Geng She cognates. There are, however, still several problems that should be addressed. First, from the perspective of Middle Chinese, Geng She consists of Geng division II (which includes 庚gēng and 耕gēng), Geng division III (including 庚gēng and 清qīng) and Geng division IV (青qīng). Norman’s research was restricted to the four forms available to him at that time. In light of new data, his analysis should be re-examined. Second, there are many strata within the Min dialect. Note that Geng divisions II and III share the same forms; Geng divisions III and IV also share the same forms. If this observation is valid, there follow some questions: How do we explain such phenomena? Which form was the earliest? How do we evaluate the relative chronology of these forms? This article has three purposes: (1) to reconstruct the primary forms of Geng She unrounded cognates in Proto-Min and its reflexes in daughter dialects, and to explore the shift that occurred in the Min dialects; (2) to explain the relative timeline of different strata on the basis of rule order; and (3) to speculate on an absolute chronology for the different strata within Min by contrasting synchronic data against Chinese historical phonology. |