英文摘要 |
Issues surrounding Heidegger’s political thought have generated a research field rife with different opinions and passionate reactions. Formerly, Heidegger’s critics occasionally tried to link his philosophical thought with Nazism, but this aroused almost the same level of attacks from other researchers who declared such criticisms to be far-fetched or not rigorous enough. The main reason for this ongoing disagreement lay in the lack of adequate evidentiary documentation. Derrida deals with this problem in a roundabout way in his book Of Spirit (1987). He makes a painstaking investigation to pursue Heidegger’s usage of the concept “Geist” (spirit), which, according to Heidegger, should be avoided yet which still appears in his texts from time to time. Derrida thus reveals how Heidegger tries to justify himself by distinguishing two German adjectives—i.e. “geistlich” and “geistig”—and how Heidegger’s thought had once been in tune with the Nazi spirit in its developmental process. The present article article attempts to explain Derrida’s interpretation of Heidegger and point out that his political strategy of deconstruction can not only reveal Heidegger’s political attitude, which the later Heidegger avoided to mention in public, but also Heidegger’s philosophical “turn” within a political context. Therefore, Derrida’s outstanding Heidegger-interpretation could be an example that prompts us to rethink this classical hermeneutical problem. |