英文摘要 |
Despite the limits of its traditional usage, the concept of the tribute systemcaptures a prominent feature of historical East Asian foreign relations andpolitics. As such, with revision and elaboration, the tribute system could stillrepresent a useful model. Therefore I will create an elaborated model,constitutive of the tribute system as international society, and scrutinize itsorganizing principles, norms and practices.First, taking a multi-dimensional view, I examine an elaborated model of thetribute system including its subsystems. Second, I describe the Korean sadaekyorin(C: shida, serving the big; jiaolin, the interrelationship with neighboringcountries) system as a semi-tribute system, and “the way of kyorin” (Mencius) asa principle. Third, I examine the system as a set of principles, norms andpractices based upon Confucian or Neo-Confucian ideas and concepts, focusingon two of them, gong tianxia (All-under-Heaven as, or for, the public) and li(principle, law, or reason) as the basis of li* (rites), to understand the organizingprinciples of the traditional East Asian regional order.Fourth, I explore the distinctive meaning of two dichotomies:hierarchy/parity in Daoist discourse and inequality/equality in Confuciandiscourse. Noting that “Sovereignty can be – and is – divisible”, I explain thesignificance of the “endemic” sovereignty of the tributary states. I conclude withseveral reasons for the collapse of the tribute system in the modern era, andobservations on China’s approach to global governance and strategy, speculatinga new East Asian regional order in the future. |