「同均三宮」論證問題之研究－－以兩篇爭論的文章為例

The Demonstration Research of ＂Tongyun Sangong＂: with two controversial articles Case

自1986年黃翔鵬提出「同均三宮」以來，歷經近30年的研究，支持者舉出各種譜例和文獻，說明成立的理由，反對者亦提出許多問題和例證，質疑其合理性；儘管「同均三宮」已被寫入辭典和教科書，至今未取得一致看法。本論文發覺，正反雙方在論述上各有對的部份，但亦有不夠周全之處，若能以「一均七調」看待問題，對於爭議的減少與了解，將能有所助益。本文以兩篇完全對立的文章為例，希冀透過再次地研究，對此問題提出看法，並尋找解決爭議的契機。

Since 1986 Xiang-peng Huang proposed ＂Tongyun Sangong＂ (同均三宮) , after nearly 30 years of research, supporters include various Scores and documents, explain the grounds; the opponents also raised many questions and examples, questioning its rationality. Although ＂ Tongyun Sangong ＂ has been written dictionaries and textbooks, it has yet to achieve the unanimous view. The paper found that the two sides discussed in each of the parts, but also comprehensive enough place, if in order to ＂ Yi yun Qi Diao ＂ (一均七調) look at the problem, reduce the controversy and understanding, will be able to help. Have two completely opposite to the article, for example, hope, their views on this issue through the study again, and an opportunity to find a solution to the dispute.