英文摘要 |
Inspired by China's new Law Anti-monopoly Guideline on Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights (Draft Guideline, 2015) on RAND principle and received comments from experts, this article further studied and summarized major relating cases and their developments. By inspecting US Federal court's new decisions and reasoning on the case Ericsson v. D-Link Systems, which applied results from economics studies, the article concluded that the comments and advices on China's Draft Guideline (2015) should be given consideration. In addition, further study on the development and trend of RAND principle is necessary for gaining judicial experiences and thus will assist legislators, judges and scholars to improve new law in future, as well as to support China's open license mode for ICT standardization practice. |