英文摘要 |
What often surprises the reader in The Shipman's Tale may be the reconciliation between the Merchant and his wife in the end. There is no wrath, no brawling, nor bitter reaction of any kind in the revealing of his cuckoldry. As the story unfolds, the Merchant is shown to have his concern elsewhere. What concerns the Merchant is the fact that he might double-charge a debtor for a loan. Yet, to the reader's amazement, the Merchant does not want his money back. If the Merchant did not ask Daun John to return the money or a thing of monetary value, how could he possibly charge him by mistake? If it is not the money that settles the account, what does the story try to hint by 'a thing that he hath payed'? Taking the ending reconciliation for the point of departure, this paper aims to facilitate a rereading of The Shipman's Tale, through latent sodomy suggested by potential textual support. Upon this premise, the paper carries on its discussions on the relationships between the Merchant and the Monk, the Merchant and his business practice, and finally between the Merchant and the Wife. This trilateral reading of relationships, among other elements found supportive, hopes to contribute to an alternative understanding of the tale. |