月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
中國文哲研究集刊 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
羅整菴的理氣論
並列篇名
The Theory of Principle and Material Force of Lo Ch’in-shun
作者 鍾彩鈞
中文摘要
羅整菴是明代程朱學派的重要代表,卻以「理氣為一」之說著稱,近幾十年更為中國大陸學界盛推為「唯物主義」。本文目的在分析整菴理氣論的內涵,以求得正確的定位。筆者以為整菴的理氣論有過渡的、折衷的性格,他一方面承認氣的決定性格,一方面又堅持理的恆定與無所不在,結果造成「理氣渾一、理一分殊」的學說,同時兼顧理與氣的重要性。為了弄清整菴理氣論的形態,筆者又取明道、伊川、朱子的理氣論做比較。筆者以為整菴理氣論乃將朱子的二元論轉回明道伊川的一元論;而在一元論中,他一方面沿襲明道善惡皆天理之說,一方面又像伊川般以理為靜定而無所不在的規範。因此其理論是折衷形態的。
英文摘要
This article is a study of Lo Ch'in-shun's doctrine of Principle and Material Force. Its main purpose is to clarify its ambiguity and to give it a proper place in the history of Chinese philosophy. In the history of Chinese philosophy Lo has been interpreted in different and even contradictory ways. He was acknowledged as a representative of the Chu Hsi school, but he held a monistic view of Principle and Material Force, which is different from Chu's dualistic view. In recent decades scholars of Mainland China even praised him as a materialist. My article points out that his doctrine is characterized by eclecticism. On the one hand, he admitted the determinative nature of Material Force; on the other, he insisted the eternity and universality of Principle. As a result, he proposed the doctrine of “oneness of priciple and differentiation of particulars,” which indicates that these two elements go side by side and are equally important. The author then compares Lo's doctrine with those of Ch'eng Hao, Ch'eng I, and Chu Hsi. Lo's doctrine is a return from the dualism of Chu Hsi to the monism of the Ch'eng brothers. As a monist, Lo accepted Ch'eng Hao's doctrine that both good and evil are Heavenly Principle, while he is similar to Ch'eng I in thinking that Principle is unmoved, omnipresent law of the world. From these characteristics it seems proper to call his doctrine eclecticism.
起訖頁 199-220
關鍵詞 理學羅欽順程顥程頤朱熹Neo-ConfucianismLo Ch'in-shunCh'eng HaoCh'eng IChu Hsi
刊名 中國文哲研究集刊  
期數 199503 (6期)
出版單位 中央研究院中國文哲研究所
該期刊-上一篇 從劉三吾《孟子節文》論君權的限制與知識份子之自主性
該期刊-下一篇 當代儒者的孟子學解釋之分析--以唐君毅、徐復觀、牟宗三為中心
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄