|
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。 【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】
|
篇名 |
解開幸福的秘密:正向比值是一個關鍵
|
並列篇名 |
The Key Unlocks the Secret of Well-being: The Positivity Ratio Does Matter |
作者 |
余民寧 (Min-Ning Yu)、陳柏霖 (Po-Lin Chen) |
中文摘要 |
本研究的目的,旨在檢定Fredrickson所提「正向比值」的假設是否存在?本研究隨機抽取臺灣地區1251名中小學教師作為樣本,並以皮爾森積差相關、t檢定與結構方程式模型等作為本研究的分析方法。研究顯示:(1)Fredrickson所提出的「正向比值」假設,被本研究證實是存在的。(2)具有正向比值大於等於3以上的人們,確實比正向比值小於3以下的人們,具有顯著較高的主觀幸福感、正向因應策略與顛峰幸福感,同時也擁有顯著較低的憂鬱情緒。(3)正向比值大於等於3以上的教師,也比正向比值小於3以下的教師,具有較低的放學後超時工作時數,且感受到來自學生、家長與同儕間的工作壓力也顯著的比較低。最後,本研究亦提出研究涵義與未來在實務應用上的建議。 |
英文摘要 |
In the current study, our purpose was to testify if the hypothesis of Fredrickson’s proposal of “positivity-ratio” was really matter with people’s happiness and well-being. A positivity-ratio greater than and equal to 3 was proposed as the major factor and the main key to happiness and well-being. For most people who perceived themselves as happy and wellbeing persons must possess the positivity-ratio greater than and equal to 3. A total random sample of 1251 teachers was recruited. The whole data were analyzed by Pearson correlations, t-test, and the SEM. Results showed that 1) the hypothesis of Fredrickson’s proposal of “positivity-ratio” was confirmed by the current study. 2) The persons with positivityratio greater than and equal to 3 were proved as having higher scores on the Subjective Well-Being Scale, Proactive Coping Scale, Flourishing Well-Being Scale, and lower scores on the Taiwan Depression Scale than those of other persons with positivity-ratio less than 3. 3) Besides, the persons with positivity-ratio greater than and equal to 3 were also had less working hours after school and perceived lower work-stress from students, parents, and colleges affairs, as compared to those of persons with positivity-ratio less than 3. Finally, implications and suggestions for practice and further studies were also proposed. |
起訖頁 |
133-151 |
關鍵詞 |
正向比值、主觀幸福感、正向因應策略、顛峰幸福感、憂鬱情緒、the positivity-ratio、subjective well-being、proactive coping、flourishing well-being、depression |
刊名 |
學校行政 |
期數 |
201609 (105期) |
出版單位 |
社團法人中華民國學校行政研究學會
|
該期刊-上一篇 |
愛恨一線間、甘苦誰人知──國中教學組長的工作壓力與工作倦怠之經驗詮釋 |
該期刊-下一篇 |
原高雄市與原高雄縣的大型及小型學校之國民中學學校經費近三年投入比較分析――以四所國中為例 |
|