論財產犯的主觀目的

On the Purpose of Property Crime

理論上關於非法佔有目的的研究有意或無意地割裂了這一構成要件的解釋與我國財產犯罪保護法益之間的緊密聯繫。現有的理論既不能充分論證非法佔有目的的存在必要性，也不能為非法佔有目的作為盜竊罪、詐騙罪共同主觀目的提供統一且合理的解釋。作為不成文構成要件要素，非法佔有目的的存在根據與內涵應當結合刑法第五章侵犯財產犯罪的保護法益進行探討。根據《刑法》第91、92條對於刑法所保護的財產範圍的界定，刑法第五章侵犯財產犯罪所保護的是作為整體的合法財產。在此基礎上，現行法下的非法佔有目的宜解釋為不法獲利目的，而非德日刑法理論中的不法領得目的。

The theoretical discussion about the purpose in the property crime is supposed to be connected with the discussion of the legal interest, which the property crime tries to protected. However, the given discussion about this concept in China has ignored this important connection, which leads to a series of confusion. This article tries to illustrate, that the purpose in the property crime is rather the purchase of enrichment, than the purchase of illegally getting ownership on certain object. That is because the property crime in Chinese context is supposed to protect the whole wealth, not only the ownership of someone.