互聯網時代的媒體與司法關係

Relationship between the Media and Judiciary in the Internet Age

互聯網時代，媒體影響司法出現了新特徵：司法系統防止媒體影響的難度越來越大，媒體編輯“把關人”的作用大大降低，因發帖人採用假名而使自律性降低且查處困難，對言論自由的標準不斷提高，陪審員利用網路實施不端行為。互聯網時代，各國對媒體與司法關係規則進行了修正：微博直播庭審開始興起和發展，英國、美國聯邦法院禁止電視直播的傳統被顛覆，已經明確廢止緘口令的部分內容。互聯網時代，媒體與司法關係規則應當包括以下內容：仍然應當堅持傳統的司法自我約束規則，通過合理界定辦案秘密以限制資訊釋放，通過司法公開防止媒體的誤導，通過媒體自律體現對司法的尊重和理解，通過網路執法過濾或刪除違法的司法報導，對違法犯罪行為追究法律責任。

New features appeared in the Internet Age: more and more difficulties for the judicial system to prevent the media influence; greatly reduced of the media editor's role as 'gatekeepers'; the reduced self-discipline and the investigate difficulties because of the post using pseudonyms; constantly improving of the expression freedom standard; Jurors implemented misconducts by using network. In the Internet Age, countries amended the rules of the relationship between the media and judiciary: trial live on micro-blog began to rise; prohibiting live trial on TV of the British and the United States federal courts is overturned; part of gag orders had been explicitly abolished. The relationship between the media and judiciary in Internet Age should cover: the traditional judicial self-restraint still should be insisted on; to restrict information release by defining case handing secret reasonably; to prevent media misleading by judicial publicity; through media-discipline to embody the respect and understanding to judicial; to filter or delete illegal judicial reports through network law enforcement; legal action will be taken against illegal actions.