月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
華語文教學研究 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
基於ACTFL之華語文寫作評分規準
並列篇名
Examining the ACTFL writing assessment rating scale for L2 Chinese learners
作者 熊玉雯李慧萱宋曜廷 (Yao-Ting Sung)
中文摘要
華語文寫作測驗近年來成為主要大型華語文能力測驗項目之一,其重要性日鉅。本研究以美國外語教學委員會(American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages,簡稱ACTFL)所制定之語言分級能力標準 為框架,制定出華語文寫作評分規準,並進一步以實證研究來探討ACTFL評分規準所遇到的問題。研究語料為國立臺灣師範大學國語教學中心華語文學習者所寫之同題目作文402篇,專業評分者受培訓後根據ACTFL評分規準評分,研究一方面能為瞭解ACTFL華語文寫作測驗的信度之實徵研究,將評分結果透過百分比一致性與類推性理論分析,檢測測驗之信度。另一方面分析ACTFL之評分架構,就評分規準在分數等級上、計分方式上、分向構面上之三主要研究議題來進行深究與探討,將對寫作測驗有實徵之回饋。
英文摘要
The demand for reliable and valid writing assessing methods of Chinese as a foreign language has grown significantly in recent years. This article reports the construction and the subsequent evaluation of the analytic rating scale based on ACTFL (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages) writing proficiency guidelines. A corpus of 402 writing scripts from different levels at the Mandarin Training Center at National Taiwan Normal University, but all in response to the same writing task, was collected and graded by five professional raters. Each writing test is independently rated by two raters. The validity of the scale is rigidly controlled throughout the construction and raters training process. The grading results provide qualitative analysis of two main points. On the one hand, the reliability of the assessment is examined in terms of the percentage of agreement between raters as well as generalizability and decision studies. On the other, a number of major issues involved in the development of a rating scale are explored for the purpose of this paper, especially on the examination of analytic rating scale against holistic rating scale, as well as the exploration of rating criteria.
起訖頁 111-139
關鍵詞 華語文寫作測驗語言能力等級評分規準信度testing L2 Chinese writinglanguage proficiencyACTFLanalytic rating scalesreliability
刊名 華語文教學研究  
期數 201412 (11:4期)
出版單位 世界華語文教育學會
該期刊-上一篇 從學習者語料庫探究趨向補語「起來」之偏誤情形及教學建議
該期刊-下一篇 「隔」與「不隔」--《漢語語言學》書評
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄