英文摘要 |
This article views each voting system of parliament as major comparing variable, for instance, both of Taiwan and South Korea adopt Mixed-Member Electoral System, the total seats of legislators are 113 in Taiwan while those are 300 in South Korea. In addition, as for regional representatives, both sides use Plurality with Single-Member- District System (Plurality-SMD) as the way to choose ones. There are a total of 73 seats in Taiwan and 246 seats in South Korea. According to Proportional Representation system, legislator-at-large seats of Taiwan are 34 while those of South Korea are 54. According to the electoral system design, the disproportionality of parallel voting in South Korea thus is higher than Taiwan. However, from the parliament election results of both countries in 2012, the problem of South Korean disproportionality was not that serious than Taiwan instead. The main reason lies in the difference between different assorted measures of electoral system; that is, the threshold of legislator-at-large seats taken 3% in South Korea while 5% in Taiwan. Finally, this article aims to provide advice for electoral reform in Taiwan through a comparative analysis of political development in both two countries. |