任你風向東南西北，我自巋然從容不迫－－國際經濟新秩序的重思：以陳安教授的國際經濟法研究為視角

Disregarding Whither the Wind Blows, Keeping Firm Confidence of His Owns--A Revisit to Prof. CHEN’s Research on NIEO

作為法學的一部分，國際經濟法的研究顯然不可能完全脫離法學研究的主流路徑而完全獨樹一幟。法學的主流研究模式分為實證法學派和自然法學派，因而國際經濟法的各種研究手段也可以大略總結為描述性研究和規範性研究兩大流派。描述性研究主要是對既有的國際經濟法律規範和組織、運行進行說明，通過語義分析闡釋規範的含義，通過數據統計分析揭示實際運行的狀況，或者通過案例研究研討規範在實踐運行中取得的成就和存在的問題。這種研究是作為一般法學方法的實證主義研究在國際經濟法中的體現。規範分析一般前設一套正當性原則，通過批判性、反思性地考察相關的規範或者實踐，或者比較不同的規範、不同的實踐或者進程，來判斷相關的規則和實踐是否正當，或者說明相關的國際經濟法進步的領域和方向何在。這種研究方法是作為法學方法的自然法學派在國際經濟法領域的具體體現，是一種顯在的價值分析的研究方式。

As a part of the science of law, the studies on international economic law cannot really deviate from mainstream approaches of legal studies and create something totally new. Since the mainstream approaches of legal studies may be categorized into positivism and natural law theory, the means of studying international economic law may also classified into two streams, namely, descriptive studies and normative studies. Descriptive studies mainly try to illustrate existing rules, organizations, and operation, to explain the meaning of rules through semantic analysis, to discover the status of operation by analyzing statistics, or demonstrate achievements and problems arising from the enforcement of rules in practice based on case studies. Normative studies need a set of principles of justice as prerequisite, and then, their main task is to make judgments on whether relative rules and practices may be regarded as legitimate tkrough a critical, reflexive examination of such rules and practices, or to specify the area and direction of international economic law for improvement. This approach is the specific embodiment of natural law approach from the field of legal theories into the field of international economic law, and should be regarded as an express value analysis.