論第三人撤銷訴訟的原告適格

ON THE COMPETENCE OF THE PLAINTIFF IN DISCONTINUE BY THE THIRD PARTY

2012年新民事訴訟法規定了第三人撤銷之訴，其具體內容還需進一步充實。目前關於何者可以作為第三人撤銷訴訟的原告，理論上和實踐中存在非常大的分歧，影響了該制度功能的發揮。理解此問題必須以第三人是否與原訴訟程序中獲得了程序保障及其有無其他的救濟途徑獲得救濟為判斷標準。故一般情況下，未參加原審程序的、應以無獨立請求權第三人身份參加訴訟的第三人可以具有該類訴訟的原告適格。同時，如果其可以再審途徑獲得救濟，則不具有第三人撤銷訴訟的原告適格。

The new civil procedure law (2012) of the PRC provides the discontinue procedure and it needs to enrich the contents of this system, There is a substantial divergence in the theories and practice of who could initiate this action. This divergence is affecting the function of this system. To comprehend this question, we should first judge whether the third party has gained sufficient procedural safeguard and has other institute relief. So if the third party should join the first trial as the third party without independent claim right, and he did not joined the procedure, then he could initiate the discontinue action. Of course if he could get remedy by the new trial procedure, then he could not enjoy the plaintiff competence of the discontinue.