英文摘要 |
In current times products have become very complex, similarly, the damages they can cause to the consumer are increasingly more dangerous. This scenario created a strong interest for consumer rights and producer liability in the last decades. Within the European Union, the major achievement was Directive 85/374/CEE, which aimed to harmonize producer liability amongst the Member States, mainly by imposing a strict liability regime. Since the Directive rules from 1985, there has been a long experience in case law (either in national courts, either in the European Court of Justice) and many studies have been published about this topic. Differently, in China the legal scenario is composed of many different regulations, to be read in conjunction, ones inspired by the European solution, others from North America. But since this regime is still quite new the case law is insufficient to completely clarify its terms and its content raises some doubts. In the present paper we will try to analyze and compare both legal solutions, pointing out its differences and similarities. Nowadays products have become so complex and potentially dangerous, and also due to a crescent concern regarding the consumer's rights, product liability is one of the main topics of litigation around the world. Despite the specificities of each legal order, there are some common notes that we can find in almost every jurisdiction, especially the imposition of a strict liability rule on the producer and the strong enforcement of consumer's rights. In the present article we will analyze and compare the legal situation on Europe and China regarding product liability, having especially in mind that this regulation is quite mature in Europe now, therefore, could influence the Chinese regime, though China went to look for huge inspiration also in the legal solution running in the United States. |