打擊錯誤與故意歸責的實現

Attack Error and Actualizing the Imputed Intent

打擊錯誤的本質問題是因果偏離與故意歸責的實現問題。法定符合說將故意抽象化，用抽象的反對動機實現故意歸責，混淆了過失行為危險與故意行為危險，忽視了因果偏離的重要性，面臨違法阻卻事由也存在適用障礙，會不當擴大結果加重犯的範圍，也無法繞開未遂犯故意的具體判斷。從構成要件的呼籲警示機能與責任的關係出發，反對動機應具有具體內容，構成要件故意應作具體化理解。具體符合說在判斷符合性時，宜遵循“危險設定→具體對象”的具體分析法，依此可以合理回應所受質疑，也可以妥當劃分對象錯誤與打擊錯誤的界限，也即行為人危險設定的對象是否存在錯誤。

The essential issue of attack error is the problem of causation error and actualizing the imputed intent. The theory of the legal according doctrine abstracts the intent and applies the abstract opposing intent to actualize imputed intent, confuses the danger of the negligent act and the danger of the intentional act, ignores the importance of causation error, causes the hindrance in elimination illegality, the scope of aggravated offense would be improperly expanded and the specific judgment on the intent of unaccomplished crime cannot by bypassed. Regarding the relationship between the appeal warning function of constitutive requirements and responsibility, opposing intent should have concrete content, and constitutive requirements of intent should be understood specifically. When judging the conformance, the theory of idiographic according doctrine should accord with the specific analysis of the 'Setting danger→Idiographic object', thus responding reasonably to doubts, properly distinguishing object error and attack error, namely, to distinguish whether the object which the doer attempted to threaten is an error or not.