體育課程目的模式之驗證

Confirmatory Purpose Modeling for Physical Education Programs

體育課程目的過程架構是課程決定之重要架構，其目的面向包括3 個關鍵概念及23 個功能性目的。本研究之目的有二，一是找出最佳體育課程目的模式，並檢視最佳目的模式是否具穩定度，二是檢視體育課程目的面向是否具效標關聯效度。研究對象為臺灣地區國小、國中、高中及大學體育教師1164 位，方法採用問卷調查法，研究工具為體育課程目的面向量表及教學效能量表，資料分析採用描述性統計、測量模式驗證、複核效化、皮爾森積差相關，結果指出：一、二階一因素（七因子）目的模式為最佳之體育課程目的模式，經複核效化後，通過整體適配度評鑑，顯示出，最佳之體育課程目的模式具穩定度；二、體育課程目的面向與體育教學效度具中度正相關(r=0.54)，具效標關聯效度。結論：體育課程目的面向具有內容效度、穩定度及效標關聯效度，未來將可應用於體育教師課程目的面向的調查，以提供體育課程改革之用。

The Purpose Process Curriculum Framework (PPCF) was the most important framework for the decision making of the physical education. The PPCF’s purpose consists of three key concepts and twenty-three functional goals in the field of the physical education. The purposes of this study were to find out the best purpose modeling for the physical education and to examine whether the modeling was stable or not, and also to check out whether the modeling had the criterion-related validity or not. The subjects included 1, 164 physical education instructors in Taiwan. The research was conducted through a questionnaire-survey and data analysis. The instruments involved the Purpose for Engaging Physical Education Scale (PEPES) and the Teaching Effectiveness Scale for Physical Education (TESPE). The collected data were analyzed by the descriptive statistic, the confirmation for the measurement model, the cross-validation, and Pearson-correlation. The results were discussed as the followings: (a) The best purpose modeling to engage the physical education was the 2-order and 7-factor modeling which was the most stable and had been tested by the whole modeling evaluation. (b) The purpose modeling to engage the physical education was positively correlated with the teaching effectiveness, and it had criterion-correlated validity. In conclusion, the purpose modeling to engage the physical education had the content validity, the stability, and the criterion-correlated validity. It could help the instructors to improve curriculum design in physical education and further help with better physical education quality.