英文摘要 |
This article aims at a comparision and clarification of Husserl’s transcendental and Heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology. The detailed procedure is as follows. In face of some domestic-psychological studies in Taiwan to which the hermeneutic-phenomenological method has been applied, our initial tasks are the explication of their theoretical background, the demonstration of their some applications, and the elaberation of the condition of possibility for their obtaining an essential structure. We will point out this condition as the self-exposure of “Sein” (Being). As we comprehend the domestic-psychologists have no distinct method to execute from the narrative description to the constitution of the essential structure; therefore, this paper suggests a workable path in Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology for reference. The transcendental-phenomenological process from the Epoché, to the Phenomenlogical Reduction, then to the Imaginative Variation is likewise the one from the textural description, to the structural description, then to the constitution of a general essential structure. Being a guide of this process, the transcendental subjectivity is also the condition of possibility for that constitution of essential structure. Based on the view of the self-exposure of “Sein” being the condition for obtaining an essential structure in the hermeneutic phenomenology, we can establish an effective method for those domestic-psychologists. Explicitly, the self-exposure of “Sein” is the leading direction of the process from the narrative description of individual thing, to the structural description, then to the constitution of a general essential structure. |