月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
教育心理學報 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
憂鬱者無助和自責之“憂鬱矛盾現象”:一個解決此矛盾現象的可能途徑之研究
並列篇名
Helplessness and Self-Blame Attributions in Depression: Investigation of one Possible Resolution of This Paradox among College Students in Taiwan
作者 吳麗娟 (Li-Chuan Wu)
中文摘要
憂鬱者常有「憂鬱矛盾現象」(depression paradox)-覺得無助又自責;一方面他們有強烈的無助感,相信自己對事物沒有影響力,另一方面又認為自己有很大的影響力,因為一切困擾都是他們引起的。在文獻中,Seligman的憂鬱無助論和Beck的憂鬱認知論,亦形成理論上的矛盾。本研究的目的乃運用Janoff-Bulman的自責歸因理論(self-blame attributions)來驗證此矛盾現象。Janoff-Bulman認為自責有兩種:個性自責(characterological self-blame)和行為自責(behavioral self-blame),且唯有「個性自責」才會引起憂鬱、無助,而行為自責則是較具建設性的自責方式。
英文摘要
Depressed persons often feel helpless to change their environment, and at the same time blame themselves for being the cause of misfortune. Paradoxically, they believe they have no effect on events, and in another sense they believe they have powerful effects. The purpose of this study was to examine a resolution of this paradox offered by Janoff-Bulman's model of self-blame attributions for depression which distinguishes between ”behavioral self-blame” and ”characterological self-blame”. In this study, college students in Taiwan were administered three Chinese versions of instruments, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Attributional Style Questionnaire-a measure of helplessness, and the Self-Blame Scale. Of 1443 students who returned surveys, a stratified sample of1000 participants was analyzed. Six research hypotheses were derived from Janoff-Bulman's model. Correlational evidence supported four of the six. Both general self-blame and helplessness were significantly positively correlated with depression. These findings support both Beck's and Seligman's models of depression, and support the existence of the paradox of belief in which depressed persons feel both helpless and self-blame about the same event. As predicted by Janoff-Bulman's model, characterological self-blame was significantly correlated with depression and helplessness. However, contrary to predictions, behavioral self-blame was also significantly positively correlated with depression and helplessness. Thus, findings of this study supported Janoff-Bulman's model of self-blame with regard to assumptions about characterological self-blame, but not with regard to assumptions about behavioral self-blame. Additional exploratory multiple-regression analyses found that helplessness and characterological self-blame were significant predictors of depression. Each uniquely predicted about 5% of the variance in depression. However, behavioral self-blame accounted for only a trivial amount of unique variance. Additionally, depression and characterological self-blame were significant predictors of helplessness, uniquely explaining 5% and 4% of the variance, respectively. Again, behavioral self-blame accounted for only a trivial amount of unique variance. Results of this study provide support for an association between characterological self-blame, helplessness, and depression. Implications and limitations of these findings, as well as suggestions for further research are discussed.
起訖頁 251-283
關鍵詞 helplessnessself-blameattributiondepressionresolution of the paradoxhelplessnessself-blameattributiondepressionresolution of the paradox
刊名 教育心理學報  
期數 199609 (28期)
出版單位 國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系
該期刊-上一篇 不同生涯決策型態大學生的決策行為研究—屬性數量變化與訊息呈現方式之效果分析
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄