月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
佛學研究中心學報 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
Changing Principle in the Samantapasadika’s Commentary on the First Rule of the Defeat Peculiar to Nun
作者 Shih,Juo-hsueh (Shih,Juo-hsueh)
英文摘要
The ruling against physical contact with the opposite sex is shared by monks and nuns. In commenting on this rule for nuns, the Samantapāsādikā--the commentary on the Pāli Vinaya-- raises a hypothetical case of physical contact between a monk and a nun. In the same situation , the monk is not to be accused of an offence, but the nun is. The reason given is because the rule for nuns contains the word sādiyeyya (should consent to). Consent indicates passivity.The investigation of this issue involves three criteria: consent, activity vs passivity, and immobility. As the rule for nuns is expressed passively but that for monks actively, this paper firstly demonstrates that passivity or activity is no crucial factor. So the word sādiyeyya is irrelevant to deciding penalties. Secondly, this paper looks carefully into the rule prohibiting sexual intercourse in order to extract some principles for determining guilt in sexual offences. This discussion shows that the offender's mental attitude (i.e. consent to the act after its performance or initial intention to do the act), not his/her physical reaction to the act serves as the criterion for determining guilt. In the rule against monks' physical contact with women, however, there exists one dubious case, which seems to present conflicting principles. But our interpretation excludes the superficial inconsistency. Moreover, immobility as a factor for innocence is fairly likely to be of later origin. This paper goes on to examine the corresponding or relevant texts of the other Vinaya traditions. We find consistency in the primary principle (i.e. consent or no consent) for determining guilt. The consideration of immobility is shared only by the Dharmaguptaka Vinaya, and for this Vinaya immobility never leads to innocence. The Chinese recension of the Samantapāsādikā also demonstrates that immobility does not guarantee innocence. Thus we may con-clude that the Samantapāsādikā switches the principle for determining innocence from mental attitude to physical reaction. This new principle, however, applies only to monks. So in the case of physical contact if a monk is the passive partner and he remains motionless, he is not to be accused of an offence even though he consents to it. Consent implies pleasure derived from the act. Such growing tolerance does not apply to nuns.
起訖頁 135-158
關鍵詞 VinayaBuddhist ethicsBuddhist nuns
刊名 佛學研究中心學報  
期數 200007 (5期)
出版單位 國立臺灣大學佛學研究中心
該期刊-上一篇 天臺智者的戒體論與「菩薩戒義疏」
該期刊-下一篇 從南天烏荼王進獻的「華嚴經」說起--南天及南海的「華嚴經」佛王傳統與密教觀音佛王傳統
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄