英文摘要 |
As the structure of Taiwanese society has been evolving from agricultural society to industrial and commercial one, and influenced by the western culture in the mean time, the call for gender equity suddenly arises. Responding to the circumstances, the family structure has been gradually transformed from a patriarchal extended family to nuclear family of husband-and-wife core. While relationship customs among family members ran from a male-centered pattern to gender equity, from one-way power to two-way balance of power, and individual independence has replaced collective consciousness, the connection and transition between traditional values and modern ones could not avoid the dilemma for family members to adapt themselves to the changes and to reconcilation. Although some fathers try to build equal and intimate relationship with their children, the dominance of traditional fatherhood still remains and is being passed on. For they have been asked for the cultural morality of ethic order required by Confucianism. Phenomenon of “Fathers just don’t teach sons themselves.” “Fathers should treat their sons with austerity, and can’t have fun with their children,” and “Fathers should keep distant with their children” still remains in many modern father-and-son relationships. Under the circumstance of change of Taiwanese society, the evolution of the meaning, function and pattern of family has led to the qualitative change of parentage. Meanwhile, the juvenile problems have been valued and explored more and more. As digenesis starts, how do the middle-aged males, inheriting their father positioned in the core of patriarchy cultural beliefs and values, apprehend how their interaction with their fathers influences their intimate relation with their juvenile sons in the waves of gender consciousness raised by feminism? The transformation, evolution and inheritance of intimacy across generations between fathers and sons are the focus of this research. To let the interviewees talk deeply about the cross-generational influence of their own father-son intimate relationships, the researcher adopt the depth interview of qualitative research for data gathering; the data analysis goes with narrative analysis for systematic clarification. As for the research sampling, this study adopts purposive sampling and snowball sampling. The objects invited in this research are middle-aged fathers between thirty-five and sixty in nuclear families with their sons attending junior high schools. This study represents five differences and influences of cross-generational intimacy of father-and-son relationship:(1)From detached indifference to dreaming of brotherhood;(2)From tangle of alienation and family love to conflict between;(3)responsibility and intimacy;(4)From euphemistically earthy care to practically necessary response;(5)From negative attention to multiple interaction;(6)From perspective fusion to personal reflection. |