英文摘要 |
The purpose of this study is to formulate and testify the adjustment theory of disparagement humor appreciation. This theory hypothesized that people with different attitudes toward the subject that humor disparages would have different humor appreciation. This study contains three experiments; manipulating attitudes toward province, party and candidate respectively to examine the hypothesis. All three experiments used two independent variables - different attitudes toward the subjects that humor disparages and humor that disparages different subjects; one dependent variable – the assessment in different disparagement humor; two control variables –between subjects counter balancing design (using two kinds of questionnaires) and using neutral jokes as the co-variable. Results were as follows: (a) Experiment 1 showed no distinct humor appreciation in attitudes toward different provinces; (b) Experiment 2 demonstrated that although subjects favoring DPP had higher humor appreciation when reading jokes that disparage the KMT, subjects favoring KMT or neutral had no difference in humor appreciation when reading the jokes that disparage the KMT or DPP; (c) Experiment 3 found that the subjects favoring Major. Ma had higher humor appreciation when reading jokes that disparage Mr. Li, and vice versa. It seems that our theory could approximately discriminate people with different attitudes. Issues of sex, personality or stereotype might be further examined in the future. |