英文摘要 |
PURPOSE: We obser ved the sensitivity of ultrasonography to detect choledocholithiasis under emergency basis and evaluated factors influencing the ultrasonic stone detection rate other than inadequate patient preparation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 92 patients receiving urgent ultrasound examination and subsequently proved choledocholithiasis by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were classified into 3 groups; Group I: with ultrasound findings of ductal dilatation and intraductal stone, Group II: ductal dilatation without visible stone by ultrasound, and Group III: neither ductal dilatation nor intraductal stone visible. Common duct dimension and stone size were measured and compared in these 3 groups of patients as well. RESULT: The overall ultrasonic intraductal stone detection rate was 57.6% (53/92). The mean common duct dimension in Group I was 16.8±6.1mm, in Group II was 13.6±3.5mm, and in Group III was 6.5±1.0mm (F test, p<0.005). The mean ductal stone dimension was 23.1±12.2mm in Group I, 13.0±5.3mm in Group II and 9.0±4.5mm in Group III respectively (F test, p<0.0005). The stone detection rate was 86.4% (32/37) in patients with common duct stone size of ≥20mm in diameter, 44.1%(15/34) in stone size between 10 to 19mm, and 19.0%(4/21) in stone size of<10mm in diameter. CONCLUSION: The urgent ultrasound had an overall sensitivity of 57.6%in detecting choledocholithiasis. Factors influencing ultrasonic detection rate of common duct stone other than inadequate patient preparation include common ductsize and intraductal stone size. |