英文摘要 |
In recent years, due to the increase in the number and size of financial restatements, government regulators have expressed great concern over restatements to correct non-GAAP financial statements. The restatements induce that investors lose confidence in the accountants because the misreports cause countless losses of investors. This study examines restatements in the period 2002-2006, together with matched control group of firms of similar time, industry, and firm size. We use a logit model to test whether the likelihood of a restatement is related to the audit quality (using nonaudit fee, auditor size, auditor industry specialization, and auditor tenure as proxies). We find that nonaudit fee exhibits a significant positively association with the occurrence of restatement. We also find auditor industry specialization and auditor tenure have a significant negatively association with the occurrence of restatement. We cannot fully document a significant negatively association between auditor size and restatement. Besides, we investigate restatements which decreasing previous income, and find that only auditor industry specialization and auditor tenure have a significant negatively association with restatement. We also consider a sample of financial statements audited and financial statements reviewed. Our results indicate that audit quality have different influence on financial statements audited or those reviewed. |