月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
台灣公共衛生雜誌 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
以德菲法建構醫療資源配置:政策利害關係人觀點
並列篇名
Using the Delphi Method to Set Priorities for Health Insurance Benefit Schemes in Taiwan: A Policy Stakeholder Perspective
作者 陳珮青李玉春 (Yue-Chune Lee)
中文摘要
目標:本研究目的為從政策利害關係人觀點來建構醫療資源配置之原則與標準。方法:藉由德菲法以郵寄問卷方式,針對曾參與健保給付或支付、資源分配規劃或諮詢經驗之政府官員、醫療服務提供者、付費者代表、健保相關學者等共62專家,收集其對於醫療資源配置之看法。結果:兩回合德菲法回收44樣本,回收率70.97%,樣本68.2%為男性,年齡平均值為54.1歲,48.8%具有博士學歷,40.0%具有20年以上工作資歷。對醫療資源配置有以下5點共識:1、資源分配給「加權健康改善程度」最多的一群人,降低族群健康的不平等。2、對資源配置需考量「醫療成本效益」、「保險財務影響」、「有效性」、「公平性」、「人體健康影響」等標準。3、贊成對弱勢族群(除臨終病人及婦女外)給付加重考量。4、醫療資源配置標準重要性依序為「成本效益」、「有效性」、「公平性」及「個人負擔」。5、建立客觀可接受經濟評估閾值。結論:醫療資源配置應訂定原則與標準,及建立客觀可接受成本效益閾值,並考量弱勢族群給付加重。本研究結果可提供衛生福利部在進行醫療資源配置或給付優先順序決策之參考。
英文摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop the principles of and criteria for healthcare resource allocation in Taiwan from the perspective of policy stakeholders. Methods: Sixty-two experts including government officials, health professionals, healthcare providers, and public/lay representatives were selected to participate via purposive sampling. The Delphi method was used for the collection of data. Two rounds of mailed questionnaires included questions aimed at identifying the criteria used by experts to establish priorities for healthcare insurance benefits. Results: Forty-four respondents completed two rounds of the Delphi exercise for a response rate of 70.97%. Most experts recommended the following: (1) Resources should be allocated according to their effectiveness in maximizing health services and eliminating health inequalities under fixed resources. (2) The criteria for resource allocation, such as cost-effectiveness, insurance financial impact, effectiveness, fairness, and human health outcome should be considered. (3) Disadvantaged groups should be assigned greater weights. (4) The relative importance of the priorities should be cost-effectiveness, effectiveness, fairness, and personal burden. (5) There is a need to establish an objective and acceptable economic assessment threshold. Conclusions: This study provides a valuable resource to guide the allocation of resources and identify the criteria used by governments in the establishment of priorities for the provision of healthcare insurance benefits.
起訖頁 193-203
關鍵詞 德菲法醫療資源配置優先順序Delphi methodhealthcare resource allocationpriority setting
刊名 台灣公共衛生雜誌  
期數 201504 (34:2期)
出版單位 台灣公共衛生學會
該期刊-上一篇 DRG為基礎前瞻性支付制度對髖關節骨折/置換術的醫療利用與照護結果之影響
該期刊-下一篇 護理人員之社會心理工作特性、工作倦怠與身心健康相互影響--固定樣本追蹤研究
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄