處於「東洋史」與「國史」之間：戰後韓國歷史學界中的臺灣史研究

Between 'Oriental History' and 'National History': Post-war Research on Taiwan History in Korean Historiography

無論在臺灣或韓國，歷史學的發展均與國家認同有著密不可分的關係，此點在本國史與外國史研究範圍的界定上，尤可清楚看出。本文的問題核心即是：本國史與外國史的範圍界定及其歷史書寫，反映出何種國別框架與歷史認識？對於與他國交纏的歷史脈絡，從本國史排出而歸之於外國史的分界點何在？在被視為外國史後，其研究價值與本國史研究的需求有何關係？又，同樣的歷史事件，在外國史與本國史的書寫中呈現何種異同，從二者的差距能否探究國別史框架對於歷史認識的限制或影響？從上述問題意識出發，本文首先整理並歸納戰後韓國史學界中主題與臺灣相關的研究成果，並置於韓國戰後史學的發展脈絡中進行評估，藉此突顯「臺灣」的史學主題，雖是在建立臺灣自我認同的時代背景下產生，但此主題到了韓國──擁有類似政治地位及歷史脈絡的史學界，臺灣史作為一種外國史，又產生不同的樣貌。進而，本文也思考韓國史學界在建立其本國史的學術歷程中──甚至包括日後擺脫其本國史思考模式的過程中，臺灣史作為一「外國史」，如何被吸收至韓國史的脈絡。本文由此思考，對於其他國家乃至國際舞台，臺灣作為一研究課題，具有何種社會意義，及可能的發展策略。

In both Taiwan and Korea, the development of historiography is closely related with national identity. Such relation is particularly obvious in the delineation between research of domestic and foreign histories. This study organizes and summarizes the topics relating to Taiwan in post-war Korean historiography, and reviews them in the context of post-war Korean historiographic development. This aims to highlight the fact despite being established during the era of self-identification, the historiography of Taiwan took on a different appearance as a foreign history when it was included in the historiography of Korean, which had similar political statuses and historical contexts. Furthermore, this paper analyzes the academic process by which the national history of Korea was constructed. The analysis even includes how Taiwan history as a foreign history was incorporated into the national history of Korea, which deviated from the conventional framework of what national history should embrace. With reference to such consideration, this study explores the social meaning and possible development strategies of Taiwan as a research topic in other countries or even in the international arena.