臺北市國小資優教育評鑑之研究

A Study on Gifted Program Evaluation in Taipei City

本研究旨在瞭解臺北市91學年度資優教育評鑑的籌劃與辦理概況及評鑑委員對評鑑的看法與建議。研究參與者為一位評鑑業務承辦人及五位評鑑委員，運用個別訪談，佐以參考文獻及各類文件資料，以質性研究法分析、歸納。研究結果如下：一、籌畫與辦理概況：本次評鑑係依據臺北市資優教育白皮書及臺北市政府教育局91年度計畫辦理，評鑑期間為92年4至5月間，業務主要由臺北市資優教育資源中心負責辦理。此次評鑑參考過去經驗與實務界建言，擬訂評鑑項目與內容，教育行政單位與專家學者均認為此次評鑑達到預期效果。二、評鑑委員對評鑑的看法與建議：受訪委員們對於評鑑方案、評鑑報告，以及如何準備評鑑等議題，均提出許多看法和建議。委員普遍認為半天之評鑑時間，雖不足夠但可接受；他們認為評鑑小組均以客觀審慎、認真的態度評鑑，經再三斟酌才確定得獎名單，評鑑結果客觀公平。委員及評鑑報告書之編輯者，大多肯定評鑑報告書之內容，但仍有局部不滿意之處。委員對於學校準備資優教育評鑑亦提出許多具體可行的建議。

The purpose of this study was to understand the preparation and implementation of Gifted Program Evaluation of 2002-2003 in Taipei City and the comments and suggestions from evaluators. The research participants included an evaluation coordinator and five evaluation committee members. It was based on the reference documentation and current documents coupled with interviews that gathered data from the individual teacher and focus groups. Data was analyzed by using qualitative research method. Its findings were as follows: 1. An overview of the preparation and implementation: The evaluation was implemented from April to May in 2003 by Taipei Resource Center for the Gifted and Talented, according to the Taipei City White Paper on Gifted Education and the 2002 Annual Plan of Taipei Education Bureau. This evaluation did come up to the expectation of educational administrators and professional experts 2. The comments and suggestions from the committee members: All of the evaluation committee members who were interviewed made their comments and suggestions toward issues of the evaluation project, report and preparation process. They all thought that the length of time for half-day evaluation was not enough but acceptable. They considered the result of evaluation objective and fair as the committee evaluated schools with cautious, objective, and sincere attitudes and the reward list was finalized after careful deliberation. In general, most of the committee members and editors of the reports had a positive attitude toward the contents of the reports even though they were not satisfied with some parts of them.