月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
民法典不動產抵押權與利用權的競存順位解釋論
並列篇名
The Priority Between Mortgage Right and Utilization Right on Real Estate in Civil Code
作者 曹明哲
中文摘要 不動產抵押權與利用權的競存可以分爲兩種類型,不動產抵押權與用益物權、不動產抵押權與債權性利用權的競存,前者在《民法典》之前較少,主要是後者即不動產抵押權與租賃權的競存。不動產抵押權與租賃權的競存中,先抵押後出租之時,抵押權優先;先出租後抵押之時,依據《民法典》第405條,占有租賃物的租賃權人可對抗抵押權人;《民法典》第405條增加“移轉占有”减少了虛假租賃的可能,但是增加了認定租賃關係的難度和交易成本,故應賦予不動產租賃權登記能力。《民法典》新增居住權,其中意定居住權與抵押權的競存依登記先後定順位;遺囑居住權不需登記即可設立,未辦理登記的,不得對抗善意的不動產抵押權人。抵押權雖優先於利用權,但利用權不影響抵押權實現,可不除去利用權,是否影響抵押權實現的判斷宜根據抵押物第一次拍賣的結果來判斷,除去利用權應依申請,且不需抵押權人另訴。
英文摘要 The competitive existence of real estate mortgage and utilization right can be divided into two types: the competitive existence of real estate mortgage and usufructuary right, and the competitive existence of real estate mortgage and creditor’s rights usufructuary right. The competitive existence of real estate mortgage and usufructuary right is less than the latter before. In the competition between real estate mortgage and leasehold, the mortgage has priority when it is mortgaged first and then leased; When leasing first and then mortgaging, according to Article 405 of the Civil Code, the leaseholder in possession of the leased property can fight against the mortgagee; The addition of "transfer of possession" in Article 405 of the Civil Code reduces the possibility of false lease, but increases the difficulty of identifying the lease relationship and transaction costs, so the ability to register the real estate lease right should be given. The Civil Code adds the right of residence, in which the priority of the competitive deposit of the voluntary right of residence and the mortgage right is determined according to the registration sequence; The testamentary residency right can be established without registration. If it is not registered, it shall not be against the bona fide mortgagee of real estate. Although the mortgage has priority over the right of use, the right of use does not affect the realization of the mortgage, and the right of use may not be removed. The judgment of whether the right of use will affect the realization of the mortgage should be based on the results of the first auction of the mortgage. The removal of the right of use should be based on the application, and there is no need for the mortgagee to file another lawsuit.
起訖頁 96-116
關鍵詞 類型化居住權土地承包經營權强制執行TypeResidencyLand Contract Management RightEnforcement
刊名 厦门大学法律评论
出版單位 廈門大學法學院
期數 202404 (38期)
DOI 10.53106/615471682024040038006  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄