月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
沒有「言論」的言論自由──言論自由作為對抗特定管制的權利
並列篇名
Freedom of Speech Without“Speech”:Freedom of Speech as Right Against Rules
作者 程源中
中文摘要 美國言論自由法學存在兩種理解方式:言論自由作為保障特定行為的權利,或是言論自由作為對抗特定管制的權利。本文先從案例與學說切入,分別說明這兩種路徑的基礎何在,並主張言論自由作為對抗特定管制的權利是更合理而融貫的詮釋。觸發言論自由的關鍵問題並非「何謂言論?」,而是系爭管制的兩種特徵:管制的不當動機疑慮,以及管制對整體溝通環境的影響。接下來本文從規範性觀點指出,這樣的觸發模式是「政府不適格」和「言論的不定性」兩條件下的最佳方案,也可能是對民主憲政體制來說普遍有效的基礎模型,即便從我國的言論自由法制脈絡來看,亦不失為值得參考的模式。
英文摘要 Two interpretations of the jurisprudence of freedom of speech exist in the United States: viewing freedom of speech as a right protecting actions or as a right against rules. This article commences with an examination of cases and theories to elucidate the underpinnings of these two approaches. It contends that construing freedom of speech as a right against rules presents a more coherent and reasonable interpretation. The pivotal question initiating free speech considerations is not“What is speech?”but rather the two features of the disputed regulation: its potential for illicit motives and its ramifications on the communicative environment. From a normative perspective, this article suggests that in the face of“governmental incompetence”and“indeterminacy of speech”, this triggering model emerges as an optimal solution, arguably serving as a universally effective foundational model for democratic constitutional systems. Even when considering the unique context of freedom of speech in our country, this model retains its value as a viable reference point.
起訖頁 277-368
關鍵詞 言論自由的保障範圍對抗特定管制的權利範疇方法表意行為消極論證政府不適格言論的不定性藝術與言論不當動機Coverage of Freedom of SpeechRight Against RulesCategorical ApproachExpressive ConductNegative JustificationGovernmental IncompetenceIndeterminacy of SpeechArt and SpeechIllicit Motive
刊名 政大法學評論
出版單位 國立政治大學法律學系
期數 202403 (176期)
DOI 10.53106/102398202024030176005  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄