| 英文摘要 |
Judicial officers lack social awareness, their so-called justice is only universal to those in the same class as them, between like-minded individuals. Judges have the freedom to determine facts on one hand，on the other hand, there is freedom of legal interpretation. However, this freedom is governed by the ideals of judges, judges achieve their ideals through adjudication. Jurors realize their ideals through factual determination. If there is a significant social ideological difference between the class to which the qualified juror belongs and the class to which the defendant belongs. The verdict is not due to the "democratization" of the jury, on the contrary, it is due to the lack of legal and judicial literacy of the opposing class of people, through their emotions and class consciousness, causing the defendant to bear extremely unfavorable judgment results. So, in the process of adjudication, we should pay attention to the "person" and their thoughts, rather than the judge or juror themselves. Finally, this article cites three cases to demonstrate that people believe that the most just and trustworthy judicial officials are also standing alongside people of the same class and ideology. |
