月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
認繳制下公司法人格否認規則對資本顯著不足情形的適用
並列篇名
On the Application of the Rule of Disregarding the Corporate Entity to the Case of Significant Undercapitalization Under the Subscribed Registered Capital System
作者 羅垚
中文摘要 公司資本認繳制改革後,以往適用法定最低註冊資本判斷公司資本是否顯著不足,以適用法人格否認規則的裁判邏輯已經失去土壤根基。儘管《全國法院民商事審判工作會議紀要》將資本顯著不足正式確立為公司法人格否認規則的事由之一,但是資本顯著不足在認繳制下是否還有適用空間仍有很大爭議。經司法裁判案例實證分析,認繳制下資本的出資數額與期限的隨意性,導致部分公司經營事業與風險不匹配,而資本顯著不足司法裁判標準的不統一,也使得債權人風險隨之增大。然,資本顯著不足在認繳制下仍有適用空間。根據債的不同,資本顯著不足在自願之債與非自願之債中所扮演的角色和發揮的作用有所不同。具體而言,首先,在自願之債中,很少單獨適用資本顯著不足,但其存在一個例外情形即欺詐;而在非自願之債中,資本顯著不足可成為唯一的決定性因素。其次,尚需要厘清資本的涵義、適用時間節點和顯著不足的界定方法。
英文摘要 After the reform of the system of the company’s registered capital subscription, the adjudicated reasoning of applying the rule of disregard of legal personality to judge whether the company’s capital is obviously insufficient by applying the legal minimum registered capital has lost its foundation. Despite the fact that the Minutes of the National Conference on Civil and Commercial Judicial Work of the Courts formally established significant capital deficiency as one of the grounds for the rule of corporate personality denial, however, there is still much controversy as to whether there is still room for the application of the significant insufficiency of capital under the subscription system. The judicial decisions have shown that the arbitrariness of the amount and duration of capital contribution under the subscription system has led to a mismatch between the business and risk of some companies, while the lack of uniformity in the judicial standards for the adjudication of significant capital deficiency has also increased the risk to creditors. However, there is still room for the application of significant undercapitalization under the contributory system. Depending on the type of debt, the role of significant undercapitalization differs between voluntary and involuntary debts. Specifically, firstly, in voluntary debt, significant capital deficiency is rarely applied in isolation, although there is an exception for fraud, whereas in involuntary debt, significant capital deficiency can be the sole determining factor. Secondly, there is a need to clarify the meaning of capital, the point in time when it applies and the method of defining a significant deficiency.
起訖頁 124-142
關鍵詞 資本顯著不足公司法人格否認資本認繳制自願債權人Significant UndercapitalizationDisregard of Corporate PersonalitySubscribed Registered Capital SystemVoluntary Creditor
刊名 厦门大学法律评论
出版單位 廈門大學法學院
期數 202204 (33期)
DOI 10.53106/615471682022040033007  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄