| 篇名 |
刑事再審程序啟動制度研究──以京津冀三地2013年到2018年間刑事再審判決書為樣本 |
| 並列篇名 |
On Criminal Retrial Starting Procedure—Taking Criminal Judgment of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei from January 2013 to May 2018 as Sampies |
| 作者 |
陳逸寧 |
| 中文摘要 |
刑事再審啟動制是實現實體公正的關鍵所在，并反映了整個刑事再審制度的功能定位與價值走向。而京津冀三地自2012年《刑事訴訟法》修改實施以來的刑事再審案件反映了我國當前存在著再審程序特殊救濟功能不突出、易淪為普通案件複查程序等問題，而這與我國刑事再審程序在價值理念和功能定位上的偏差有著密切的關係。結合刑事再審程序背後的價值博弈、功能定位與特徵，以及域外相關的刑事錯案糾正制度，有必要從價值理念、決定主體、啟動標準和審查程序等四個方面進行改革。 |
| 英文摘要 |
Criminal retrial starting procedure is the key to select cases and reflect functional orientation of the whole retrial system. Criminal retrial cases in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei since the amendment of criminal procedure law 2012 reflect some problems re-garding to current retrial procedures, including the lack of special relief function and the trend to degenerate into review procedure. On the basis of various values, functional orientation and overseas relevant correcting systems of misjudged criminal cases, it is necessary to carry out some reforms from four aspects, value concept, reviewers, starting standards, as well as review procedure. |
| 起訖頁 |
156-176 |
| 關鍵詞 |
刑事再審、啟動機制、糾錯、救濟、Criminal Retrial、Starting Procedure、Errors Correction、Relief |
| 刊名 |
厦门大学法律评论 |
| 出版單位 |
廈門大學法學院
|
| 期數 |
202106 (32期) |
| DOI |
10.53106/615471682021090032003 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
