| 英文摘要 |
The contemporary discourses of scholars such as Zhao Tingyang, Sheng Hong, Xu Jilin and Zhu Suli on “familyＧcountryＧworld” can be regarded as a part of the discourse of “world”. However, the approach of structuring the discourse in terms of “family-country-world”, or “cultivating oneself, putting family in order, governing the state, and pacifying the world”, as opposed to the general discourse on the so-called “world”, does not have the same emphasis in different discourses, thus demonstrating the differences in the positions, concerns and claims of its practitioners. In addition to the differences in emphasis between specific discourses, these differences also constitute a po-tential “dialogue” or even “opposition” and “confrontation” between explainers. This situ-ation demonstrates the richness and contemporaneity of traditional thought, as well as the many possibilities for linking history and reality. Which of these different discourses of the world is more persuasive, influential and what kind of influence they have depends not only on their ability to respond to intellectual, doctrinal and even ideological challenges and challenges, but also on the shape and change of the social reality to which they relate. |
