| 英文摘要 |
The advancements of the technology have changed not only the way we live, but also the communication methods, especially through digitaliztion. During the court activity, regardless of civil proceeding or criminal proceeding, communication amount the participants occurs in the procedure. The advent of the digital communication has made it possible for people to communicate via the internet. The remote interrogation of the witnesses can be acomplished through the boardless internet nowadays. In order to prevent the spearing of the virus, the judicial system had no choice but to open court through remote proceedings during the covid pandemic. Therefore, numerous of unsolved controversial issues rose. This article will clarify the nature of the remote interrogation by examining its relationship with the principal of immediacy. Exploring the legislative framework of the remote interrogation through this clarification and further analyze the legislation of remote interrogation to our country. Lastly, this artical will solve the practical issues concerning remote interrogation, such as the ligislative system of remote interrogation, the order of application comparing to exception to hearsay rule, the possibility of subsituting the attendance of the defendant with remote interrogation, and the equiptment necessity for conducting remote interrogation. |
