|
|
| 篇名 | 經濟刑法的空白授權與罪刑法定原則 |
|---|---|
| 並列篇名 | The Blank Authorization of Economic Criminal Law and Nulla Poena Sine Lege |
| 作者 | 黃俊杰 |
| 中文摘要 | 憲法法庭判決闡明「證券交易法屬經濟刑法，應符合憲法要求」之基本前提，除證券交易法有特別規定者以外，刑法總則係應適用之。 立法機關制定之證券交易法及其授權訂定之法規命令，歸屬經濟刑法領域之刑罰法規，應符合憲法罪刑法定原則及所衍生之刑罰明確性原則與授權明確性原則等之要求。 臺灣存託憑證（TDR）是否屬於證券交易法之有價證券、應否及何時成為證券交易法有價證券之犯罪客體與所涉空白授權指引模式類型之複雜性，均涉及人權影響之重要憲法議題。 |
| 英文摘要 | The Constitutional Court’s judgment clarifies that“the Securities and Exchange Act is an economic criminal law, it should comply with the constitutional requirements.”Therefore, the general provisions of the Criminal Code shall apply to the Securities and Exchange Act unless otherwise provided. The Securities and Exchange Act enacted by the legislature and the regulation authorized therefrom belong to the penal regulations in the field of economic criminal law, they shall comply with Nulla Poena Sine Lege, and the Principle of Clarity of Punishment and the Principle of Explicit Delegation derived therefrom. Whether Taiwan Depositary Receipts (TDRs) are securities under the Securities and Exchange Act, and whether TDRs should become, or when TDRs had already become the object under the Securities and Exchange Act, and the complexity of the involving types of blank authorization guidance models, are important constitutional issues that affect human rights. |
| 起訖頁 | 1-34 |
| 關鍵詞 | 憲法法庭判決、經濟刑法、罪刑法定原則、空白授權、臺灣存託憑證、The Constitutional Court’s Judgment、Economic Criminal Law、Nulla Poena Sine Lege、Blank Authorization、Taiwan Depositary Receipts (TDRs) |
| 刊名 | 財產法暨經濟法 |
| 出版單位 | 臺灣財產法暨經濟法研究協會 |
| 期數 | 202309 (73期) |
| DOI | 10.53106/181646412023090073001 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode | |
|
