| 篇名 |
Death Sentence and the Saiban-in (Lay Judges) System in Japan: Focusing on a Recent Precedent |
| 並列篇名 |
死刑判決與日本裁判員制度：聚焦於近期案例 |
| 作者 |
城下裕二 |
| 中文摘要 |
日本有八起案件，上訴法院撤銷了初審由裁判員(saiban-in)做出的死刑判決，且最高法院亦維持該判決結果。部分人士批評如此破壞了裁判員制度的目的，但本文透過探討一則近期的案例，從基本量刑原則的角度指出這種批評不適當。 |
| 英文摘要 |
In Japan, there have been eight cases in which the appeal court has quashed a death sentence handed down by the first instance of a saiban-in (lay judges) trial, and the Supreme Court has upheld that conclusion. Some have criticised these precedents for undermining the purpose of the saiban-in system, but this article examines one recent case to show that such criticisms are not appropriate from the viewpoint of basic sentencing principles. |
| 起訖頁 |
146-159 |
| 關鍵詞 |
死刑、裁判員制度、量刑原則、量刑因素、預謀、Death Sentence、Saiban-In (Lay Judges) System、Sentencing Principle、Sentencing Circumstance、Premeditation |
| 刊名 |
月旦法學雜誌 |
| 出版單位 |
元照出版公司
|
| 期數 |
202412 (355期) |
| DOI |
10.53106/1025593135509 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
