| 英文摘要 |
Generative AI, in criminal substantive law, may result in the disclosure of business, official secrets or personal privacy, infringement of intellectual property rights, the use and dissemination of false information, and the enhancement of the intensity of cybercrime, and other legal risks. Accordingly, Taiwan’s criminal law and subordinate criminal laws have been amended in response.
Generative AI is now also widely used in criminal practice. For example, it can be used to simulate crime scenes, drug factories, frauds, the organization of criminal groups, and even to predict the behavior of an attacker during investigations. In trials, it can also be used to assist in the drafting of judgments, which will pose new challenges for the criminal procedure law. It is necessary to build trustworthy generative AI norms to maintain the people’s trust in the judiciary. In the long run, the Basic AI Act should be formulated as a principle to improve the framework of AI legal system in Taiwan. |
