| 英文摘要 |
In terms of the construction and development of Taiwan’s trade union system, due to the long-term influence of the government control and other related political factors after the end of World War II, coupled with the weak collective awareness of general workers and employers’ distrust of trade unions, trade unions which have established and related trade union activities are not easy to carry out. In view of this, our country has completed the revision of the ’’Three Labor Laws (Trade Union Law, Group Agreement Law, and Labor Dispute Settlement Law) around 2010, establishing the so-called“unfair labor practice system”with the main legislative purpose of protecting labor unions and related activities. Therefore, from the perspective of the nature of the (administrative) system of relief for unfair labor practices, this article explains the trade union law policy of unfair labor practice system, as well as the connotation and characteristics of the adjudication system constructed based on the purpose of this policy, and discusses the adjudication system of the nature of administrative relief. The interlocking relationship with the judicial system includes the interdependence and interdependence between different judicial relief channels and rulings and decisions such as administrative litigation and civil litigation. Furthermore, since the adjudication system has been in operation for more than 10 years since its establishment, the above-mentioned administrative (adjudication decisions) and judicial (court judgments) different relief ways are examined through statistical survey data such as the current status of practical operations of the relevant systems. The interconnected relationship and the difficulties faced in the implementation of the system. |
