| 英文摘要 |
In order for a citizen to effectively participate in a criminal trial, a determination must be made at the preliminary proceedings as to whether the evidence is admissible or not, and the courts shall consider the necessity of the evidence investigation in accordance. However, in the Japanese Saibanin system, it is important to consider whether facts similar to the facts, which can be presented, i.e., “Similar Fact Evidence,” or whether evidence of the defendant’s prior convictions, i.e., “Bad Character Evidence,” can be presented as the facts of the crime in this case. In this regard, this article first explains the distinction between the relevance of evidence, the necessity of the evidence investigation in accordance, and the dangerous caused by the investigation of evidence, and then uses them as criteria for the selection of evidence by the court in the preliminary proceeding. In this regard, this article first explains how the Japanese Saibanin system should present Similar Crimes Evidence as a basis for determining the facts of a crime. |
