| 英文摘要 |
From the perspective of social activity safety obligations, Taiwan supreme Court imposes that business operators should ensure the safety of their business environment and auxiliary facilities in accordance with Article 7 of Taiwanese Consumer Protection Law. The nature of this obligation is almost an obligation of result, and it belongs to a no-fault liability with no reason for exemption. In addition, the right to claim punitive damages in Article 51 of Taiwanese Consumer Protection Law should be limited to a consumer, not accessible to a third party. In case of his death, it is affirmed that the heir or the administrator of the estate is the subject of the request in practice, and the scope of the request should include property and non-property damages. |
