篇名 | 訴願法修正草案評析 |
---|---|
並列篇名 | Some Comments on the Revised Draft of Administrative Appeal Act |
作者 | 簡玉聰 |
中文摘要 | 我國訴願法,自1930年制定,歷經1970年及1998年兩次全面修正,至2022年修正草案,雖已漸趨完備,但因欠缺對戰前法制結構之徹底反省,仍然殘留下述諸多問題,有待繼續檢討改進。一、訴願法立法目的應明定化;二、訴願前置主義應完全廢止;三、訴願類型應充分多元化;四、訴願期間應適度放寬;五、反射利益概念應被廢止以廣泛放寬行政處分概念;六、原則廢止執行力理論與例外特別規定;七、應增訂公費辯護權保障規定;八、訴願決定救濟期間應適度放寬;九、賦予言詞辯論裁量權限應再商榷;十、訴願不受理事由應再檢討。 |
英文摘要 | Although Taiwan’s Administrative Appeal Act, enacted in 1930, after two comprehensive revisions in 1970 and 1998, until the revised draft in 2022, has become more and more complete; however, due to the lack of thorough reflection on the legal structure before World War Ⅱ , many problems remain and the review and improvement is continued. 1. The legislative purpose of Administrative Appeal Act should be clearly defined; 2. The prepositionalism of administrative appeals shall be completely abolished; 3. The types of administrative appeals shall be fully diversified; 4. The period of administrative appeals shall be moderately relaxed; 5. The concepts of reflective benefits should be abolished to broadly relax the concepts of administrative actions; 6. The theory of enforcement force shall be abolished in principle and exceptions are subject to special provisions; 7. The provisions on the protection of the right to defense at public expenses should be added; 8. The period of legal remedy for the decisions of administrative appeals should be moderately relaxed; 9. Granting discretionary authority to oral arguments should be deliberated again; 10. The reasons for an unacceptable administrative appeal shall be reviewed again. |
起訖頁 | 82-94 |
關鍵詞 | 訴願法、訴願前置主義、行政處分、反射利益、訴願期間、Administrative Appeal Act、Prepositionalism of Administrative Appeals、Administrative Actions、Reflective Benefits、Period of Administrative Appeals |
刊名 | 月旦法學雜誌 |
出版單位 | 元照出版公司 |
期數 | 202303 (334期) |
DOI | 10.53106/1025593133405 複製DOI DOI申請 |
QRCode | |