月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
訴權理論之新開展
並列篇名
New Development of Right of Action in Civil Procedure Rule
作者 許士宦
中文摘要 臺灣2020年民事訴訟法修正就訴權制度所為之改革,既與德、日兩國同法未設明文規定者不同,亦與法國同法所設規定者有所不同,實具本土化訴訟制度之特色。新法明認訴權為程序上權利,使其與實體私權有別;且於訴權要件欠缺而可補正之情形,經法院命原告補正而未補正者,始得逕以訴訟判決駁回其訴,以保護本案判決請求權。
英文摘要 The amendment of Taiwan Civil Procedure Rule in 2020 has made some changes considering the right of action. The new rules have their unique features and are unlike their counterparts of other nations: nether do the they resemble rules in Germany and Japan, for the civil procedure rules in Germany and Japan do not contain statutes regulating the right of action, nor do the they resemble rules in France, which do have certain statutes considering the right of action but have different content. The amendment has made a clear statement that the right of action are rights which derive from procedural rules, and distinguish them from rights that derive from substantive law. When procedural prerequisites are fail to be met but are possible to be met, the court should order the plaintiff to fulfill those prerequisites. Only if the plaintiff still fail to fulfill the prerequisites after the order can the court dismiss the case via adjudication. That way, people’s right of requesting the court to review his case can be asserted.
起訖頁 6-22
關鍵詞 訴權理論本案判決請求權訴訟判決訴訟權Right of Action (Cause of action)Right of Requesting the Court to Review the CaseAdjudicationRight of Access to the Courts
刊名 月旦法學雜誌
出版單位 元照出版公司
期數 202303 (334期)
DOI 10.53106/1025593133401  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄