篇名 | 健康資料加值應用的下一步──資料治理與信任擔保 |
---|---|
並列篇名 | Next Steps in Health Data Value-Added Applications–Data Governance and Trust Guarantee |
作者 | 翁逸泓 |
中文摘要 | 本文之目的在於憲法法庭健保資料庫案判決後,試圖理解健康資料治理在法制上應當蘊含之框架論理以及比較法制。 憲法法庭認為現行法制並未滿足健康資料領域資料治理的基本要求。未來,在資料治理之立法設計上,應注意對於人民個人基本權利之保障、健康資料之再利用與分享所能帶來的公共效益與資料經濟,以及企業間的公平競爭等三者間的衡平。另外,相關法制的制定順序與範圍非常重要,且就一般資料利用法制與特別領域資料利用法制之間,也必須有明確之界限與關聯性。最後,無論就論理與比較法層面言,利害關係人彼此的信任關係係核心價值所在。 |
英文摘要 | This article aims to understand the framework and rationale that should be contained in the legal framework of health data governance and to compare the legal system after the judgment of the Constitutional Court in relation to the National Health Insurance Research Database.
The Constitutional Court held that the current legal system cannot meet the basic legal requirements for health data governance. In the future, the design of data governance legislation should pay attention to the balance between the protection of the fundamental rights of individuals, the public interests, data economy brought about by the re-use and sharing of health data, and the fair competition among enterprises. In addition, the relevant legal framework is crucial in the formulation sequence and scope, and there must also be clear boundaries and correlations between the legislation for general and specialised data usage. Finally, in terms of theory and comparative law, the trust relationship between stakeholders at stake is the core value. |
起訖頁 | 24-36 |
關鍵詞 | 資料治理、個人資料保護、健保資料庫、歐盟一般資料保護規則、隱私權、資料利他主義、資訊受託人、歐盟健康資料空間規則、Data Governance、Personal Data Protection Law、National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD)、GDPR、Right to Privacy、Data Altruism、Information Fiduciaries、Regulation on the European Health Data Space |
刊名 | 月旦法學雜誌 |
出版單位 | 元照出版公司 |
期數 | 202212 (331期) |
DOI | 10.53106/1025593133102 複製DOI DOI申請 |
QRCode | |