| 篇名 |
萊劑殘留標準的立法權限憲法爭議⎯⎯⎯⎯評111年憲判字第6號判決 |
| 並列篇名 |
Constitutional Dispute over the Legislative Authority of the Standard of Ractopamine Residues: Comments on the 111-Xian-Pan-6 Decision |
| 作者 |
許育典 |
| 中文摘要 |
111年憲判字第6號判決為憲法訴訟法施行後，憲法法庭就地方自治保障案件作出的首件判決。本案主要爭點有二：一、進口肉品及其產製品殘留乙型受體素的安全容許量標準，屬中央立法事項或地方立法事項？二、行政院就聲請人各地方議會，函告其所通過的各該自治條例無效或不予核定部分，是否逾越憲法賦予中央監督地方自治的權限範圍？ |
| 英文摘要 |
The 111-Xian-Pan-6 Decision was the first judgment made by the Constitutional Court on a case of local self-government protection after the implementation of the Constitutional Court Procedure Act. There are two main points of contention in this case: 1. Is the safety tolerance standard for residual β-receptor hormone in imported meat and its products a matter of central or local legislation? 2. The Executive Yuan inform the petitioners and local councils by letter that the self-government regulations passed by them are invalid or not approved. Does it exceed the scope of the central government’s authority to supervise local self-government under the Constitution? |
| 起訖頁 |
181-189 |
| 關鍵詞 |
111年憲判字第6號判決、萊劑殘留標準案、地方立法權、地方自治、統一解釋法令、111-Xian-Pan-6 Decision、the Case of Standard for Ractopamine Residues、Local Legislative Power、Local Autonomy、Unified Interpretation Decree |
| 刊名 |
月旦法學雜誌 |
| 出版單位 |
元照出版公司
|
| 期數 |
202209 (328期) |
| DOI |
10.53106/1025593132811 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
