|
|
| 篇名 | 從德國法角度評析我國二○二二年刑事訴訟暫行安置新法 |
|---|---|
| 並列篇名 | Analyzing the 2022 New Regulations of the Criminal Procedure Code on the Provisional Placement from the Perspective of German Law |
| 作者 | 連孟琦 |
| 中文摘要 | 近年來數起精神病犯犯下嚴重犯行之案件，引起社會大眾恐慌，也揭露我國刑事訴訟法長年以來欠缺相對應於刑事實體法之程序雙軌制。現行刑事訴訟法之羈押或預防性羈押，精神衛生法緊急安置及強制住院，以及保安處分執行法之緊急監護處分，都無法滿足適當處置無責任能力被告，以保護大眾安全之需求。本文經由比較德國刑事訴訟法第126a條之暫時安置，評析我國二○二二年二月公布之暫行安置新制（刑事訴訟法第121條之1至第121條之6），指出條文之缺失並提出修法建議。 |
| 英文摘要 | In recent years, several cases of serious crimes committed by mentally ill accused have caused panic among the public. They also revealed that there had been a lack of a dual system of criminal procedures corresponding to substantive criminal law for a long time. The current legal institutions, such as remand detention or Danger of recidivism as the ground for remand detention, the Mental Health Act, and Emergency tutelage, are not suitable institutions to deal with the mentally ill accused for public security. By comparing with German provisional placement (§126a German code of criminal procedure), this article examines the new regulations regarding provisional placement in Taiwan (§121-1 -§121-6 Taiwanese code of criminal procedure) and proposes a suggestion for improvement. |
| 起訖頁 | 227-304 |
| 關鍵詞 | 暫行安置、保安處分、矯治與保安處分、監護、人身自由、強制治療、精神衛生法、身心障礙者權利公約、法治國原則、無罪推定原則、速審原則、Provisional Placement、Rehabilitative Measures、Measures of Reform and Prevention、Tutelage、Right to Freedom、Coercive Treatment、Mental Health Act、Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities、CRPD、Rule of Law、Principle of Presumption of Innocence、Requirement of Rapid Action |
| 刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
| 出版單位 | 國立政治大學法律學系 |
| 期數 | 202306 (173期) |
| DOI | 10.53106/102398202023060173004 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode | |
|
