月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
自檢視公司法第178條規範析論股東利益衝突之解決模式
並列篇名
An Analysis of Section 178 of Taiwan Company Act and Alternating Mechanisms to Deal with Shareholders’Conflicts of Interest
作者 周振鋒
中文摘要 股東遇股東會議案有自身利害關係致有害公司利益之虞時,公司法第178條(以下稱「本條」)禁止其行使表決權,避免其因私害公。但本條構成要件相當抽象,執行上易衍生爭議,又缺乏股東自身利害關係資訊提供之配套,致使本條實際發揮作用甚為有限。另法院對違反本條之認定與效果亦有分歧意見,使本條規範實益令人質疑。此外,倘大股東或控制股東對有自身利害關係議案皆應迴避,反使公司意思由少數股東決定,似有違股份有限公司之資合性質。在此些疑慮下,本文建議刪除本條,另重新思考規範解決股東之利益衝突關係。尤其在有大股東或控制股東主導的併購交易,股東之利益衝突關係甚為明顯,應有特別規範之必要。本文擬以參考國外法制規範作為借鏡,再衡酌本國法制環境後,提出本文見解與未來修法建議,期能藉本文拋磚引玉,對我國公司治理法制進步略盡綿薄貢獻。
英文摘要 According to Section 178 of Taiwan Company Act (the Section), a shareholder who has a personal interest in the matter under discussion at a meeting, which may impair the interest of the company, shall abstain from voting. However, there is a doubt that the Section can function as expected in practice due to the vague languages used in the elements and no any mechanism to disclose conflicts of interest for the company and its shareholders to identify who will be interested. Furthermore, courts’ opinions split on how to apply the Section, which makes the Section unforeseeable and difficult to be complied with. It also raises a question whether the minority shareholders, instead of big shareholders or controlling shareholders who are not allowed to vote, could appropriately make fundamental decisions on behalf of the company and all shareholders as a whole. In conclusion, this Article suggests that the Section be deleted and Taiwan Company Act reconsider a new mode of regulations to deal with the conflict of interest issues involving shareholders. After surveying various institutions in foreign jurisdictions and taking the characteristics of our legal system into account, this Article concludes by proposing some recommendations for future legal reform.
起訖頁 129-203
關鍵詞 公司法第178條利害關係迴避表決控制股東股東會受任人義務釋字第770號解釋商業判斷法則少數股東多數決不公平救濟Article 178 of Company ActConflict of InterestAbstain from VotingControlling ShareholderShareholders MeetingFiduciary DutyJ.Y. Interpretation No. 770Business Judgment RuleMajority of MinorityUnfair Prejudice
刊名 政大法學評論
出版單位 國立政治大學法律學系
期數 202209 (170期)
DOI 10.53106/102398202022090170003  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄